<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/integrity/</link>
	<description>Ethics, Law &#038; Good Practice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:18:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik Sherman</title>
		<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/1-integrity/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>As you&#039;re talking about integrity, you might note that while this is the standard at the school, it is often common in the industry - on the part of publishers and freelance writers who retain their rights - to resell material and to rework existing writing into new forms, so long as it&#039;s done by someone having the appropriate rights and with the knowledge of those purchasing the work. The same would go with reusing research, also a common, and accepted, practice. It&#039;s fine to insist on more stringent standards for course work, but you don&#039;t want to leave students ready to assume that something is an ethical violation when it may not be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you&#8217;re talking about integrity, you might note that while this is the standard at the school, it is often common in the industry &#8211; on the part of publishers and freelance writers who retain their rights &#8211; to resell material and to rework existing writing into new forms, so long as it&#8217;s done by someone having the appropriate rights and with the knowledge of those purchasing the work. The same would go with reusing research, also a common, and accepted, practice. It&#8217;s fine to insist on more stringent standards for course work, but you don&#8217;t want to leave students ready to assume that something is an ethical violation when it may not be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Sherman</title>
		<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/1-integrity/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Not to be picky, but I&#039;d question the use of &quot;critique.&quot; That certainly can be part of journalism, but often isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be picky, but I&#8217;d question the use of &#8220;critique.&#8221; That certainly can be part of journalism, but often isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas McBean, Edinburgh, Scotland</title>
		<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas McBean, Edinburgh, Scotland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/1-integrity/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Sirs - a great idea to put this online - hopefully not a hostage to fortune!

I like the words of Samuel Johnson in this area:

&quot;Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful&quot;.

I am presently preparing an application to the MS program for Fall 2008!

Douglas McBean, Edinburgh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sirs &#8211; a great idea to put this online &#8211; hopefully not a hostage to fortune!</p>
<p>I like the words of Samuel Johnson in this area:</p>
<p>&#8220;Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am presently preparing an application to the MS program for Fall 2008!</p>
<p>Douglas McBean, Edinburgh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Norman</title>
		<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.nyu.edu/ethics/handbook/1-integrity/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>What troubles me most about this opening gambit in NYU&#039;s ethics code are three words missing from this section. &quot;Tell the truth.&quot;

I know the author and a few of his colleagues went round and round on this, airing perhaps some post-modern angst about the nature of &quot;truth,&quot; or perhaps falling prey to some residual deconstructionist impulses. 

But it seems to me that teachers want to talk to students in the plainest of terms, and that&#039;s what we want our students to do -- Tell The Truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What troubles me most about this opening gambit in NYU&#8217;s ethics code are three words missing from this section. &#8220;Tell the truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know the author and a few of his colleagues went round and round on this, airing perhaps some post-modern angst about the nature of &#8220;truth,&#8221; or perhaps falling prey to some residual deconstructionist impulses. </p>
<p>But it seems to me that teachers want to talk to students in the plainest of terms, and that&#8217;s what we want our students to do &#8212; Tell The Truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
