<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/">
<title>PressThink</title>
<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/</link>
<description>PressThink: Ghost of Democracy in the Media Machine, by Jay Rosen.</description>

<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-12T11:46:59-05:00</dc:date>

<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.33" />


<items>

<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/04/12/hesaid_shesaid.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/30/huffpost_fnd.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/26/flying_seminar.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/02/06/took_moyers.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/20/write_self.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/04/chronicle_hlp.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/12/30/bettinger_qa.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/09/18/because_we_have.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/09/03/mccain_strategy.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/20/motherjones_hype.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/13/national_explain.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/07/ross_replies.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/04/abcnews_qs.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/07/14/a_most_useful_d.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/04/12/hesaid_shesaid.html">
<title>He Said, She Said Journalism: Lame Formula in the Land of the Active User </title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/04/12/hesaid_shesaid.html</link>
<description>Any good blogger, competing journalist or alert press critic can spot and publicize false balance and the lame acceptance of fact-free spin. Do users really want to be left helpless in sorting out who&apos;s faking it more?  The he said, she said form says they do, but I say decline has set in.</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-04-12T11:46:59-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/30/huffpost_fnd.html">
<title>Introducing the new Huffington Post Investigative Fund (And My Own Role in It)</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/30/huffpost_fnd.html</link>
<description><![CDATA["The announcement of its birth, along with the $1.75 million starter budget, is really the launch of a new Internet-based news organization with a focus on original reporting.  You might say the Fund's operating principle is: <i>report once, run anywhere</i>."]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-30T01:37:47-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/26/flying_seminar.html">
<title>Rosen&apos;s Flying Seminar In The Future of News</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/03/26/flying_seminar.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[For March 2009. The pace quickened after Clay Shirky's <a href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/03/newspapers-and-thinking-the-unthinkable/">Thinking the Unthinkable</a>. Here's my best-of from a month of deep think as people came to terms with the collapse of the newspaper model, and tried looking ahead. I know these twelve links work. I tested them on Twitter.]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-03-26T01:08:54-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/02/06/took_moyers.html">
<title>It Took 23 Years, But I Finally Got to Give My View of the National Press on National Television</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/02/06/took_moyers.html</link>
<description>I was a guest on Bill Moyers Journal (PBS, Feb. 6) along with Salon&apos;s Glenn Greenwald. We talked about pundits and reporters as an establishment institution, and whether Obama can be a disruptive force.</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-02-06T23:57:11-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/20/write_self.html">
<title>Write it Yourself: My Advice to Barack Obama</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/20/write_self.html</link>
<description>&quot;Obama may have inaugurated a new style in press relations: not the warm embrace, or out in the cold. Neither feed the beast, nor win the week. I will just call it the cool style, and let others more learned in American cool unfold what it means for our president.&quot;</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-20T05:00:54-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html">
<title>Audience Atomization Overcome:  Why the Internet Weakens the Authority of the Press </title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html</link>
<description>In the age of mass media, the press was able to define the sphere of legitimate debate with relative ease because the people on the receiving end were atomized--  connected &quot;up&quot; to Big Media but not across to each other. And now that authority is eroding. I will try to explain why.</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-12T00:02:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/04/chronicle_hlp.html">
<title>Help Me Explain Twitter to Eggheads</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/04/chronicle_hlp.html</link>
<description>I have a nifty assignment from Chronicle of Higher Education to write about why I&apos;m on Twitter. Personal essay, 1200 words, for print and online. Wanna help?  If you&apos;re on Twitter, tell me what you use it for.  </description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2009-01-04T12:50:49-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/12/30/bettinger_qa.html">
<title>Make Something Valuable to Journalism and Give it Away: Stanford Re-Deploys its Journalism Fellows</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/12/30/bettinger_qa.html</link>
<description>In which I interview the director, Jim Bettinger, on why one of the most prestigious mid-career fellowship programs in the U.S. has shifted its focus to innovation and entrepreneurship in journalism. &quot;Our epiphany came sometime in the fall of 2005,&quot; he says.</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-12-30T00:42:26-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/09/18/because_we_have.html">
<title>If Bloggers Had No Ethics Blogging Would Have Failed, But it Didn&apos;t. So Let&apos;s Get a Clue.</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/09/18/because_we_have.html</link>
<description>&quot;Those in journalism who want to bring ethics to blogging ought to start with why people trust (some) bloggers, not with an ethics template made for a prior platform operating as a closed system in a one-to-many world.&quot;</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-18T10:22:08-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/09/03/mccain_strategy.html">
<title>The Palin Convention and the Culture War Option</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/09/03/mccain_strategy.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[John McCain's convention gambit calls for culture war around the Sarah Palin pick.  And now The Politico is reporting just that: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13101.html">Palin reignites culture wars</a>. An option is forming. This is my attempt to describe it before her big speech in St. Paul.]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-03T00:22:19-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/20/motherjones_hype.html">
<title>Hype Busting at Mother Jones Goes Bust</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/20/motherjones_hype.html</link>
<description>Has Obama compared his campaign to the great movements in progressive history, like civil rights? Mother Jones says he has. What were the editors thinking? And why aren&apos;t they linking?  </description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-20T00:44:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/13/national_explain.html">
<title>National Explainer: A Job for Journalists on the Demand Side of News</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/13/national_explain.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[This American Life's great mortgage crisis explainer, <i>The Giant Pool of Money</i>, suggests that "information" and "explanation" ought to be reversed in our order of thought. Especially as we contemplate new news systems. ]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-13T11:18:33-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/07/ross_replies.html">
<title>&quot;The Whole Anthrax Case Would Make For a Good Journalism Class.&quot; Brian Ross Responds.</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/07/ross_replies.html</link>
<description>This week Dan Gillmor and I posted our questions for ABC News about its reporting in October, 2001 linking anthrax attacks in the US to Iraq.  Brian Ross, the reporter on the case, has now responded. But I wouldn&apos;t say he brought clarity to the matter.  </description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-07T00:54:17-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/04/abcnews_qs.html">
<title>Three Vital Questions for ABC News About its Anthrax Reporting in 2001</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/08/04/abcnews_qs.html</link>
<description><![CDATA["On Saturday morning, Dan Gillmor and I had the same thought when we read Glenn Greenwald's post: <i>ABC News has to respond.</i>  But to what, exactly? We tried to put it into three questions: tough but fair as people there would probably say on other occasions."]]></description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-04T00:11:32-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/07/14/a_most_useful_d.html">
<title>A Most Useful Definition of Citizen Journalism</title>

<link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2008/07/14/a_most_useful_d.html</link>
<description>It&apos;s mine, but it should be yours.  Can we take the quote marks off now?  Can we remove the &quot;so-called&quot; from in front?</description>
<dc:subject></dc:subject>

<dc:creator>Jay Rosen</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-14T01:37:52-05:00</dc:date>
</item>



</rdf:RDF>