Selling Skin
by Suzanne Rozdeba
Produced for the Web by Elizabeth L. Varnell
Brandi Chastain U.S. Soccer Star out of uniform
|
A little
thickness around the waist and some well-defined thigh muscles
have never looked better, thanks to a recent spate of magazine
ads, cover pages and television commercials featuring charismatic,
powerfully built women athletes like the tennis star Venus
Williams and Marion Jones, the 2000 track and field Olympic
sensation.
But
don't be misled. The efforts of big-time marketers to appeal
to the "average woman" by anointing formerly taboo body
types with advertising dollars, does not mean the end of
the ultra feminine, lithe, white ideal. There may now be
some room to affirm more realistic images of a female athlete's
body, but so far, not quite enough.
Muscle Mania
Three months after Brandi Chastain ripped off her shirt
for a stadium full of 90,000 soccer fans to celebrate the
1999 World Cup victory of the U. S. Women's Soccer Team,
she appeared nude in a two-page spread for Gear
magazine. Sweat beaded her toned body and she held a pair
of soccer balls strategically on her chest.
The
reaction Reith heard from Chastain's admirers after
the Women's World Cup was "God she's so buff!" |
When
asked why Nike-endorsed Chastain has been singled out by
publications like Gear
and Sports Illustrated,
Kathryn Reith, Nike's
senior communications manager, cited Chastain's musculature
as well as the excitement she helped generate for women's
soccer.
And, Reith added, Chastain
is a perfect representative of Nike's decision to feature
women athletes who are muscular but lean. "We don't want
to send the message that you have to be anorexic to be beautiful,"
Reith said. "I think the fact that we have consistently
used women who have muscles and curves has been very positively
received."
Reith particularly pointed
out how Chastain's body image is admired by so many women.
The reaction Reith heard from Chastain's admirers after
the Women's World Cup was: "God, she's so buff!"
Reebok, too, over the past
several years has employed a similar strategy in its ad
campaigns, but has often preferrred everyday women "with
different shapes and sizes" over sports stars, according
to Sharon Barbano, who heads up marketing for women's sports
at the firm.
The strategy does seem
to tap into the zeitgeist. If the most requested searches
for athletes on the website lycos.com
are any indication, the top picks this past January were
tennis stars Jennifer Capriati and sisters Serena and Venus
Williams. All three have imposing, muscular bodies, not
in keeping with the '80s ideal of female athletes - particularly
women tennis players of the Chris Evert mold - slim and
not noticeably muscular.
Even Playboy.com
featured photos of the WNBA's Sheryl Swoopes - fully dressed
- for being voted one of the sexiest female athletes. And
Swoopes' muscular, 6-foot-1, 145-pound stature is not the
standard Playboy shape of choice.
True, women who don't play
sports for a living have little chance of toning up to the
level of Marion Jones, but, as associate publisher of Esquire,
Renee Lewin explained, Jones' body type is one that average
women see as more attainable than the long-standing anorexic
ideal.
When Esquire
featured Olympic swimmers in its July 2000 issue, she said,
women readers wrote in to express support, applauding the
appearance of bodies not usually photographed for men's
magazines. Behind the skimpy towels, the athletes' bodies
had imposing upper torsos, rounded waists and muscular thighs.
"This was not a cheesy, pin-up show," said Lewin.
Still, there are plenty
of "pin-up shows" around. Although Marion Jones, swimmer
Megan Quann and a seductively dressed tennis star Anna Kournikova
all made the cover of "Sports Illustrated" last year, they
were the only three. So far in 2001, prancing swimsuit models
have been the only women to make the magazine's cover. Can
you guess which issue it was?
NEXT:
Average= White Femininity
>>
|